ZETEC OR DURATEC? PRO'S AND CON'S
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:18 pm
Hey guys,
I am interested in doing a Zetec (or potentially Duratec) conversion to a Mk2 Escort and would like to research both as objectively and factually as I can before starting to think about sourcing parts.
I realize that the Zetec has it's limitations but for now I have settled on the Zetec conversion for the following reasons;
1) It is a modern engine that offers aluminum construction (low weight), twin cams, 16 valves and EFI. I love the Pinto but I think it is time to consider some more modern engine technology (my opinion only!).
2) I understand it requires little to no modification of the original bodywork depending on gearbox selection? I like this very much.
3) I am not chasing huge horsepower from a naturally aspirated application. This is a mild street application with a few to turbocharging.
4) Parts are commonly available and seem to be relatively inexpensive from a modification and maintenance perspective.
So, first questions;
ZETEC
Is the black top Zetec the best option in terms of bottom end strength and head design compared to the silver top?
Is the black top (or silver top) Zetec widely available as a turbocharged variant? If so, will the factory turbo parts be usable in a RWD application?
DURATEC
The Duratec has some compelling pro's but I understand the bulkhead/floor/tunnel needs mods to accommodate the Duratec and it's factory drive train? Can the Duratec be fitted without body mods?
Is the Duratec widely available as a turbocharged variant? If so, will the factory turbo parts be usable in a RWD application?
I'm sure Neville has asked this before - what options do we in Oz have in terms of conversion parts? I have looked at the RetroFord kit and it seems a comprehensive if somewhat expensive option. Has anyone done their own fabrication or looked into having parts made locally?
Has anyone done either conversion that can offer their thoughts and comments on? I have started this thread with the intent to clearly define the pro's and con's of either engine in an objective forum that distills the facts into a usable and informative narrative.
Cheers, Dan
I am interested in doing a Zetec (or potentially Duratec) conversion to a Mk2 Escort and would like to research both as objectively and factually as I can before starting to think about sourcing parts.
I realize that the Zetec has it's limitations but for now I have settled on the Zetec conversion for the following reasons;
1) It is a modern engine that offers aluminum construction (low weight), twin cams, 16 valves and EFI. I love the Pinto but I think it is time to consider some more modern engine technology (my opinion only!).
2) I understand it requires little to no modification of the original bodywork depending on gearbox selection? I like this very much.
3) I am not chasing huge horsepower from a naturally aspirated application. This is a mild street application with a few to turbocharging.
4) Parts are commonly available and seem to be relatively inexpensive from a modification and maintenance perspective.
So, first questions;
ZETEC
Is the black top Zetec the best option in terms of bottom end strength and head design compared to the silver top?
Is the black top (or silver top) Zetec widely available as a turbocharged variant? If so, will the factory turbo parts be usable in a RWD application?
DURATEC
The Duratec has some compelling pro's but I understand the bulkhead/floor/tunnel needs mods to accommodate the Duratec and it's factory drive train? Can the Duratec be fitted without body mods?
Is the Duratec widely available as a turbocharged variant? If so, will the factory turbo parts be usable in a RWD application?
I'm sure Neville has asked this before - what options do we in Oz have in terms of conversion parts? I have looked at the RetroFord kit and it seems a comprehensive if somewhat expensive option. Has anyone done their own fabrication or looked into having parts made locally?
Has anyone done either conversion that can offer their thoughts and comments on? I have started this thread with the intent to clearly define the pro's and con's of either engine in an objective forum that distills the facts into a usable and informative narrative.
Cheers, Dan